I do think that in certain lines of work physical
attractiveness is wanted and needed. You have to think worldly. Sex sales, it’s
the bottom line. Man or woman physical attractiveness is a must. Job offers are typically made by managers of small operations
(Exhibit 16.13) and
human resources staff in large organizations. Some managers
conduct background checks, drug tests, or obtain other information after a job
offer is made. They do so because they do not want to risk losing their best
candidates while they wait for information. Not ever scenario applies
though for physical attractiveness. It doesn’t matter if you’re model worthy to
be a janitor at Wal-Mart. No that may not be the case at Drais nightclub. It
all depends on the particular industry. I do think it’s legal to hire “models”
to serve in whatever capacity if that’s what’s required to operate that
particular business. As for advice I would only say as long as sexual
harassment isn’t an issue then there really shouldn’t be an issue. If the job
requires models to be free of scars, and or blemishes it’s not much a person
can do for that. These are uncontrollable factors and I don’t think it could
totally disqualify a candidate. I would say it depends on the employer and
needs of the company. Tattoos is another issue. If the job required no tattoos
and the employee went and got a full sleeve then that violates what the person
was hired for. There are industries that models with body art could be
welcomed. A person could be hired at Hard Rock Café as a waiter or bartender.
The tattoo look is welcomed in a place themed by music. Here in Las Vegas you
see attractive people almost everywhere. It all depends on their industry.
No comments:
Post a Comment